News


Can You Reach Your Potential If You Play It Safe?

September 12, 2019

HRD'S - Can you really reach your potential if you play it safe (and just stay in Collins Street!)?​


Derwent recently continued its successful HR forums in Sydney and Melbourne which addressed the matter of  “Elevating HR Executives in the Boardroom”.  
Courtney Blood, Principal Derwent was joined by Athalie Williams, Chief People Officer, BHP and Davina Stanley, MD Clarity College and Clarity Thought.
The key themes that were discussed centred around HR having the courage and necessary commerciality to influence the executive team and the board in a way that the people and culture agenda is not considered an add on. Playing it safe doesn’t get results.

Be Brave and Courageous!


It is vital to consider and understand the direction of the conversation you want to have with the board. You need to be a  truth teller  and help them make sense of a cluttered landscape.
Have conversations with the directors as and when needed and be open with the executive team about your interaction with the board.
Use data, be commercial, be purposeful . Have a clear point of view and utilise data and commercial information to illustrate and prosecute your case. Davina shared with the group her thoughts on articulating your message, if you can’t concisely put your message onto one page, then do you really know your topic?
Be structured and very clear about the purpose.

Frame your presentation based on the following question:
“As a result of the communication, I want my audience to….”  E.g. agree with the proposal. It will shift the emphasis of your communication to action focused rather than just passive information sharing.

The Hayne report is having a significant and far reaching impact.


Make sure you have read it! Boards are spending an increasing amount of time understanding and assessing cultural risk and remuneration alignment. What does a good governing board look for and what are the signs of a healthy and constructive culture?

Although there are many cultural measures available, there is a need to ensure the right mechanisms are in place to measure cultural risk. This is an area of uncertainty for many organisations and it’s crucial to identify leading indicators rather than lag indicators e.g. starting to see cultural dashboard developments.

Executive remuneration is continuing to be an area of internal and external scrutiny. Financial versus nonfinancial measures. HR’s role in this debate is to ensure that effective KPIs are in place that appropriately flow down to company, team and individual targets. The structure of executive remuneration needs to be reflected in the values and priorities of the organisation from a cultural and commercial perspective. Typical measures such as employee satisfaction surveys are inadequate. Available data is not being utilised effectively and with boards taking more a  “show me, not tell me",  HRD’s need to be truth tellers to the board – utilising available information and articulating the issue clearly with an action plan ready.

You can’t build your career if you stay in the same lane.


Dean Barr – Principal Industrial and Courtney Blood – Principal Consumer shared their recent experience in conducting senior HRD searches. The terms ‘commercial, transformation and business partner’ have become overused in the industry. The language is used, however, the examples and the capability that underpins these terms is not readily evident.
They suggested the need for HR to ensure that they understand the financial impact of any initiatives - if it's cost out, then, how much? If it’s business integration, then what was the saving? If it’s talent strategies, then can you show the difference the talent made to the business performance?
Pay attention to this information, and then use it to describe your contribution – LinkedIn, your resume, in interview.
To grow your career, playing it safe isn’t going to be enough of a differentiator – you need a willingness to change job location, a desire to move onto broader business-based roles (e.g. organisational transformation roles) and the ability to build strong collaborative relationships outside of the function.
Traditional career paths in HR are changing. Skills required will include strong project or program experience with lean and agile environments. Larger business partnering functions are making way for much smaller executive business consulting capability, underpinned by strong shared service functions.
We discussed what makes best in class HR.
  • Highly curious – burning interest in how things work.

  • They take the approach that it’s business first. Often, they have been in consulting or broader business roles. They avoid advocating solely on behalf of the employees without understanding the demands and priorities of all stakeholders.

  • Take the time to deeply learn the business.

  • Stay connected to the workforce – spend meaningful time with employees and follow the processes, not just the odd site visit.

  • Critical that time has been spent in programme/project management – understand how different levers are used in the business e.g. time, spread and scope; everyone is competing for capital within the business. 

  • They take risks in their career, location, role. They have a bigger plan for themselves. It's not about the need to tick all the boxes, e.g. I would like to only work in the CBD.

Share this Article

Recent Articles

By Michelle Gardiner October 14, 2025
Senior executives navigating the transition from executive to Non-Executive Director roles face a pathway that's less organic and more deliberate than many expect. Derwent delved into this important topic with 50 senior executives in Brisbane last week at our Pathway to the Boardroom event. Despite different journeys throughout their executive careers and into a Board portfolio, our speakers, Susan Forrester AM and Teresa Dyson , shared their wisdom across the decisions that support your transition to Director, the importance of leveraging networks across your career, value addition and the shift from an operating mindset, and the importance of thorough due diligence. Key Themes & Takeaways Pathway from executive to non-executive The pathway is not easy during transition from an executive career. You need to be “eyes wide open and have a thick skin” – there will be individual and market circumstances that will test your resolve and motivations. A deliberate and formal transition to a Board career can make the path clearer – especially for the networks that are trying to advocate for your Board candidacy. Many individuals expect that they will organically end up on boards after their executive career; however, in reality it’s a long process that requires patience, intent, and effort. The power of your network Leverage your network of experience and draw on different periods of your career journey for introductions and conversations that might lead to Board opportunities. Map out a plan of who you should be talking to, including existing Board members, other well-networked senior executives, Board communities (such as AICD), and relevant experts such as Board search partners. By letting broad networks know of your intention and desire to join Boards, it can provide opportunities to get a foot in the door. Get out there and plant a lot of different seeds! The importance of your value-add proposition Many aspiring Board Directors can tick a lot of the boxes when it comes to the criteria for Board candidacy, but the difference can be the fit to specific organisations. Your value addition can be identified across various facets, including your functional or industry expertise, your broader career achievement or success (such as major transactions, industry changes, working in different settings or ownership structures, etc), and personal or ethical alignment. Part of developing your individual proposition is sharing the unique elements of your profile with your networks, including the personal experiences and drivers that can be as important as your professional experience. Director mindset versus executive mindset New Directors often try to prove their executive and sometimes technical expertise, and need to make the shift to a mindset of governing over managing – “noses in and fingers out”. There’s a style of thinking from an executive career that allows you to draw on your experience and add real value to a Board setting. A change in mindset is required in order to add value in the critical areas for a Board member, such as setting and agreeing strategy alongside management, managing risk, and selecting the CEO. Conducting due diligence as you explore Board opportunities Due diligence is mutual – both for companies bringing on a Board member, and Board members looking to join an organisation. Exploration may include reading previous annual reports, talking to brokers or customers, and most importantly meeting the Chair, committee members, and other Directors if possible. Each Board has its own risk appetite, so it’s important to understand the values and risk alignment. Building relationships with other Board members to have open and honest conversations can take time and trust. “Boards are like a team – they don’t train together often, but they come together to play”. Our thanks to Michelle Gardiner , Managing Partner from our Board practice, for hosting this event, and to our guest speakers and attendees for their valuable contributions. Continue the conversation We'd love to hear your perspective on this topic! For further insights or to explore how Derwent can help you or your organisation, connect with our team at brisbane@derwentsearch.com.au . To express your interest for future Derwent events, please reach out to us at events@derwentsearch.com.au .
By Michelle Gardiner October 1, 2025
Australian boardrooms are confronting an unprecedented convergence of regulatory complexity, technological disruption, and stakeholder scrutiny. With mandatory climate reporting, rising cybersecurity threats, and AI disruption accelerating across industries, boards are making decisive talent moves to reposition their organisations. The focus is shifting from traditional oversight to strategic, innovative leadership in an increasingly complex environment. Moving from shareholder-only management to multi-stakeholder governance has become central to these strategies. Critical Talent Trends Artificial Intelligence: The New Governance Frontier – AI has emerged as perhaps the most significant governance challenge facing Australian boards with immediate implications. Board members need to ask two fundamental questions: What can AI do for our organisation? What risks does AI bring? Yet many Australian boards remain unprepared for voluntary AI reporting recommendations, opting to wait for potential mandatory frameworks in the future. This represents a fundamental shift from traditional technology oversight, now requiring directors capable of navigating complex AI implementation, risk assessment, and strategic deployment across business operations. Cybersecurity: Critical Board Responsibility – the cybersecurity landscape presents stark challenges that demand board-level attention, with Australian data revealing the magnitude of this threat: cybercrime reports reached over 87,400 in FY24, with incidents logged every six minutes. We're witnessing emerging directors with strong commercial experience and contemporary cyber skills securing board positions ahead of more experienced candidates who lack these specialised capabilities. This pattern suggests a growing recognition of cyber expertise as increasingly valuable in boardroom composition, reflecting the evolving threat environment and the rising importance placed on directors who possess relevant digital risk management capabilities . Climate Governance: From Aspiration to Action – climate governance has fundamentally shifted with the AICD's analysis showing that Australian boards are moving from aspiration and ambition to action, but progress is uneven. The regulatory framework is now concrete, with the introduction of mandatory climate reporting under globally-aligned standards representing a major milestone and requiring boards to increase oversight of climate risk, transition strategy, and scenario analysis. This transition demands directors who understand both the technical aspects of climate reporting and the strategic implications of sustainability transformation across business models. Board Diversity: Progress and Challenges – substantial progress has been made in gender diversity, with women representing nearly half of board appointments to ASX 300 boards over the last two years and holding 35% of ASX board positions overall. However, broader diversity challenges remain significant. There is still work to be done with 91% of ASX 300 Directors having an Anglo-Celtic background and only six openly LGBQTIA+ ASX directors. Consensus is forming around the AICD's and 30% Club's objective of securing 40/40/20 (40% men/40% women/20% of any gender) representation, but investors are applying pressure to see broader ethnic diversity that will better reflect businesses' customer bases and operational footprint. Shareholder Pressure – the shareholder activism landscape has intensified significantly, with Qantas’ shareholders rejecting the company's remuneration plan with a near-record 82.9% opposition following corporate scandals, demonstrating how reputation directly impacts board accountability. This escalating scrutiny requires directors who can navigate complex stakeholder relationships while maintaining strategic focus and delivering sustainable performance outcomes. Corporate Culture Accountability – corporate culture accountability has transformed from aspiration to a regulatory requirement. The events at Qantas, Mineral Resources, WiseTech and Nine Entertainment demonstrate that investors will hold boards accountable for cultural failures. Industry Super Funds have pioneered this change, with Aware Super requiring its fifty largest investments to answer eleven questions focusing specifically on conduct risk. This reflects broader stakeholder scrutiny, with over 10% of ASX 300 businesses receiving votes against their remuneration reports last year – the largest proportion since legislation was introduced.
By Lindsay Every September 23, 2025
With AI transformation being a key focus for organisations, maximising the opportunities lies in understanding the leadership requirements and the approach to people engagement. Derwent explored this critical topic with senior executives in Sydney last week at our AI and The People breakfast event, examining three areas shaping the future: How people functions can support AI transformation. How AI is reshaping people management and operations. How leadership and team recruitment criteria are evolving in an AI world. The panel discussion delivered practical insights on how leading organisations are navigating AI workforce transformation, including the real changes, challenges, and opportunities they're experiencing. We heard from Peter Tonagh , Chairman at Quantium, and Catherine Walsh , Group Chief People Officer at Qantas, who shared their perspectives on leading AI transformation we’re still learning to understand ourselves. Highlighting that as leaders we cannot wait for certainty, or we will remain behind. We must adapt to lead through more ambiguity than we have faced before. Key Themes & Takeaways The Leadership Imperative : AI represents a fundamental leadership moment defining competitive advantage, with success being 80% about people and 20% about technology. Discussion emphasised leaders must reimagine value creation, shift from the "department of no" to AI-enablers, and take a holistic approach addressing mindset, skillset, and toolset together. Leaders must become 'Chief Excitement Officers' providing permission with guardrails while managing cognitive load impacts within their organisations, recognising that employees will use AI regardless of policy and that organisations not offering AI tools will lose talent. Strategic Implementation and Human-AI Partnership : The conversation outlined starting everything with AI as the default approach, focusing on capability over tools and customer benefit through clear use cases as competitive necessity. Successful implementation augments human judgement with AI enhancing HR practices including performance management and coaching with examples of enhanced performance reviews and recruitment outcomes. Leaders must become conductors of human-AI teams through effective engagement, setting direction and making judgement calls while ensuring AI amplifies capabilities, maintaining oversight while AI tools help leaders become better coaches, and addressing bias as a user problem requiring active correction. Future Talent Strategy and Trust Evolution : Critical attributes for AI-ready talent emerged as curiosity, critical thinking, persistence, agility, and optimism, challenging myths about graduates who are actually more AI-attuned than before. The conversation addressed balancing innovation with care, building trust through transparency, and ensuring continuous evolution while maintaining human connection as irreplaceable. Discussion emphasised continuous tool evolution requiring adaptable capabilities, documenting and sharing learnings, and ensuring people develop judgment to question AI appropriately. These insights underscore the critical need for Australian business leaders to embrace AI strategically while overcoming conservative risk tolerance. The conversation provided a comprehensive roadmap for organisations navigating AI transformation, from immediate implementation challenges to longer-term competitive advantages that will define future success. Our thanks to Lindsay Every , Group Managing Partner at Derwent for hosting this panel discussion, and to our guest speakers and attendees for their valuable contributions. Continue the conversation We'd love to hear your perspective on this topic! For further insights or to explore how Derwent can help you or your organisation, connect with our team at sydney@derwentsearch.com.au . To express your interest for future Derwent events, please reach out to us at events@derwentsearch.com.au
Show More
By Michelle Gardiner October 14, 2025
Senior executives navigating the transition from executive to Non-Executive Director roles face a pathway that's less organic and more deliberate than many expect. Derwent delved into this important topic with 50 senior executives in Brisbane last week at our Pathway to the Boardroom event. Despite different journeys throughout their executive careers and into a Board portfolio, our speakers, Susan Forrester AM and Teresa Dyson , shared their wisdom across the decisions that support your transition to Director, the importance of leveraging networks across your career, value addition and the shift from an operating mindset, and the importance of thorough due diligence. Key Themes & Takeaways Pathway from executive to non-executive The pathway is not easy during transition from an executive career. You need to be “eyes wide open and have a thick skin” – there will be individual and market circumstances that will test your resolve and motivations. A deliberate and formal transition to a Board career can make the path clearer – especially for the networks that are trying to advocate for your Board candidacy. Many individuals expect that they will organically end up on boards after their executive career; however, in reality it’s a long process that requires patience, intent, and effort. The power of your network Leverage your network of experience and draw on different periods of your career journey for introductions and conversations that might lead to Board opportunities. Map out a plan of who you should be talking to, including existing Board members, other well-networked senior executives, Board communities (such as AICD), and relevant experts such as Board search partners. By letting broad networks know of your intention and desire to join Boards, it can provide opportunities to get a foot in the door. Get out there and plant a lot of different seeds! The importance of your value-add proposition Many aspiring Board Directors can tick a lot of the boxes when it comes to the criteria for Board candidacy, but the difference can be the fit to specific organisations. Your value addition can be identified across various facets, including your functional or industry expertise, your broader career achievement or success (such as major transactions, industry changes, working in different settings or ownership structures, etc), and personal or ethical alignment. Part of developing your individual proposition is sharing the unique elements of your profile with your networks, including the personal experiences and drivers that can be as important as your professional experience. Director mindset versus executive mindset New Directors often try to prove their executive and sometimes technical expertise, and need to make the shift to a mindset of governing over managing – “noses in and fingers out”. There’s a style of thinking from an executive career that allows you to draw on your experience and add real value to a Board setting. A change in mindset is required in order to add value in the critical areas for a Board member, such as setting and agreeing strategy alongside management, managing risk, and selecting the CEO. Conducting due diligence as you explore Board opportunities Due diligence is mutual – both for companies bringing on a Board member, and Board members looking to join an organisation. Exploration may include reading previous annual reports, talking to brokers or customers, and most importantly meeting the Chair, committee members, and other Directors if possible. Each Board has its own risk appetite, so it’s important to understand the values and risk alignment. Building relationships with other Board members to have open and honest conversations can take time and trust. “Boards are like a team – they don’t train together often, but they come together to play”. Our thanks to Michelle Gardiner , Managing Partner from our Board practice, for hosting this event, and to our guest speakers and attendees for their valuable contributions. Continue the conversation We'd love to hear your perspective on this topic! For further insights or to explore how Derwent can help you or your organisation, connect with our team at brisbane@derwentsearch.com.au . To express your interest for future Derwent events, please reach out to us at events@derwentsearch.com.au .
By Michelle Gardiner October 1, 2025
Australian boardrooms are confronting an unprecedented convergence of regulatory complexity, technological disruption, and stakeholder scrutiny. With mandatory climate reporting, rising cybersecurity threats, and AI disruption accelerating across industries, boards are making decisive talent moves to reposition their organisations. The focus is shifting from traditional oversight to strategic, innovative leadership in an increasingly complex environment. Moving from shareholder-only management to multi-stakeholder governance has become central to these strategies. Critical Talent Trends Artificial Intelligence: The New Governance Frontier – AI has emerged as perhaps the most significant governance challenge facing Australian boards with immediate implications. Board members need to ask two fundamental questions: What can AI do for our organisation? What risks does AI bring? Yet many Australian boards remain unprepared for voluntary AI reporting recommendations, opting to wait for potential mandatory frameworks in the future. This represents a fundamental shift from traditional technology oversight, now requiring directors capable of navigating complex AI implementation, risk assessment, and strategic deployment across business operations. Cybersecurity: Critical Board Responsibility – the cybersecurity landscape presents stark challenges that demand board-level attention, with Australian data revealing the magnitude of this threat: cybercrime reports reached over 87,400 in FY24, with incidents logged every six minutes. We're witnessing emerging directors with strong commercial experience and contemporary cyber skills securing board positions ahead of more experienced candidates who lack these specialised capabilities. This pattern suggests a growing recognition of cyber expertise as increasingly valuable in boardroom composition, reflecting the evolving threat environment and the rising importance placed on directors who possess relevant digital risk management capabilities . Climate Governance: From Aspiration to Action – climate governance has fundamentally shifted with the AICD's analysis showing that Australian boards are moving from aspiration and ambition to action, but progress is uneven. The regulatory framework is now concrete, with the introduction of mandatory climate reporting under globally-aligned standards representing a major milestone and requiring boards to increase oversight of climate risk, transition strategy, and scenario analysis. This transition demands directors who understand both the technical aspects of climate reporting and the strategic implications of sustainability transformation across business models. Board Diversity: Progress and Challenges – substantial progress has been made in gender diversity, with women representing nearly half of board appointments to ASX 300 boards over the last two years and holding 35% of ASX board positions overall. However, broader diversity challenges remain significant. There is still work to be done with 91% of ASX 300 Directors having an Anglo-Celtic background and only six openly LGBQTIA+ ASX directors. Consensus is forming around the AICD's and 30% Club's objective of securing 40/40/20 (40% men/40% women/20% of any gender) representation, but investors are applying pressure to see broader ethnic diversity that will better reflect businesses' customer bases and operational footprint. Shareholder Pressure – the shareholder activism landscape has intensified significantly, with Qantas’ shareholders rejecting the company's remuneration plan with a near-record 82.9% opposition following corporate scandals, demonstrating how reputation directly impacts board accountability. This escalating scrutiny requires directors who can navigate complex stakeholder relationships while maintaining strategic focus and delivering sustainable performance outcomes. Corporate Culture Accountability – corporate culture accountability has transformed from aspiration to a regulatory requirement. The events at Qantas, Mineral Resources, WiseTech and Nine Entertainment demonstrate that investors will hold boards accountable for cultural failures. Industry Super Funds have pioneered this change, with Aware Super requiring its fifty largest investments to answer eleven questions focusing specifically on conduct risk. This reflects broader stakeholder scrutiny, with over 10% of ASX 300 businesses receiving votes against their remuneration reports last year – the largest proportion since legislation was introduced.
More Posts